Aug 23 2010

Superheroes

 

SUPERHEROES  inspired by Islam, a Video to Watch! 

 

 

the 99

(Click HERE to play the Video)

In “THE 99,” Naif Al-Mutawa’s new generation of comic book heroes fight more than crime — they smash stereotypes and battle extremism. Named after the 99 attributes of Allah, his characters reinforce positive messages of Islam and cross cultures to create a new moral framework for confronting evil, even teaming up with the Justice League of America. 

President Obama commends THE 99 for Spreading Tolerance

President Obama made a special mention about THE 99 superheroes and its creator, Dr. Naif Al-Mutawa, in his speech given recently at the Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship held in Washington. The President commended THE 99 for capturing the imaginations of young people through the message of tolerance. Entrepreneurs from all over the globe are attending the summit, including Dr. Naif Al-Mutawa, creator of THE 99 superheroes.

See  the full White House video (16:17)  Pres. Obama and The 99

http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/presidential-summit-entrepreneurship

On CNN:  Islam-inspired comic superheroes fight for peace

the 99 on CNN 

New York Times article (January 22, 2006): Comics to Battle for Truth, Justice and the Islamic Way

I wish Dr. Mutawa the best of success!   NYT Dr. Al Mutawa family

God’s Blessings to You and your family.

The creator of these Superheroes inspired by Islam is a Psychologist  (among The 500 Most Influential Muslims - 2010),  from an openminded new generation of Muslim, who has found the ultimate tool for todays kids to learn about Islamic values and a most brilliant way to eradicate negative attitudes towards Islam.

Download your  Free copy of The 99  Origins  by klicking this line!

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     * 

 

 

BLESSED  RAMADAN  to all my readers,

May God show us all the right path!

Mona


Feb 02 2010

Churches firebombed in Malaysia

Hello my dear readers!  Sorry being away from my blog so long, I have been somehow busy otherwise.

 

Here we go again, Ignorance is the root of all evil.

What can I say.  I will quote the whole article, I hope Al-Jazeera doesn’t mind:

Churches firebombed in Malaysia 

January 10, 2010

Two more churches and a Catholic convent school in Malaysia have been targeted by arsonists, amid a row over the use of the word “Allah” by non-Muslims.

Police said there were no reports of injuries in Sunday’s incidents, which brought the total number of churches attacked since Friday to six.

Molotov cocktails were hurled at the All Saints church and the school in Taiping in Perak state.

“There were black marks on the wall [of All Saints]. We believed there was a small fire earlier but there was no damage as the wall was intact,” Zulkifli Abdullah, the state police chief, said.

He said a broken bottle filled with the inflammable liquid paraffin was found inside the compound of St Louis Catholic Church.

Muslims protesting

Muslim groups have staged protests in response to a court ruling last week that gave a Catholic newspaper the Herald the right to print the Arabic word for God, Allah, following a long-running dispute with the government over the issue.

Thousands of Malaysian Christians turned up to Sunday services, despite the recent tensions.

Four churches in the Kuala Lumpur area have been hit by firebombs since Friday, leaving one badly damaged with its ground floor gutted, and prompting Najib Razak, the prime minister, to promise to crack down on race crime.

Hermen Shastri, secretary-general of the Council of Churches, said officials had stepped up security in the wake of the attacks.

“The attacks show they are more just a prank as it does not appear to be a major [attack], someone is trying to send a signal that they are unhappy,” he said.

The word Allah has been used by Malay-speaking Christians for centuries, as well as by Christians in Arabic-speaking countries and in Indonesia.

Rev Lawrence Andrew, editor of the Herald, has said there is no other appropriate term for God in Malay.

About 10 per cent of Malaysians are Christians, including about 850,000 Catholics. Around 60 per cent of the population are Muslims.”

 *   *   *   *

 

The same news article on BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8447450.stm .

Allah is the word Jesus used to address God in his mother tongue Aramaic and there is still a small community speaking that language in today’s Syria. They were also engaged as actors for the well known 2004 Movie   “The Passion of the Christ”.

Arabic speaking  Christians do not have another name for God, either.  Aramaic, Arabic and Hebrew are all Semitic languages and very close to eachother.

There is only One God, The Almighty, The Merciful  no matter with what names we call and pray to  Him.

 

Hoping this drop of information in the ocean of Ignorance could do some good.

 

Salaam,

wish my readers a prosperous and happy 2010.

 

Mona

 

 


Apr 11 2008

“Send me your stereotypes”

Another woman among the 100 most powerful women in the world is

HM Queen Rania of Jordan   Queen Rania (Number 80 on Forbes 100 Most powerful women of the world list and maybe not so significant but worth of mentioning - the third most beautiful woman in the world in the 2005 top 100 of Harpers & Queen magazine).

She is an outspoken advocate of women rights and well loved and respected in her home country. She is a new idol of an Arab woman, wise, family oriented and sympathetic.

And as so many of us she is frustrated over the ongoing misinformation and stereotyping of Muslims and especially Arabs and Arab women. She is introducing herself now on Youtube, where the youth of the world is communicating and is reaching out for dialog.

YOUTUBE EXCLUSIVE:  Send me your stereotypes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFf897bUW2Y&eurl=http://www.play.jo/home.php

 

 

 

And as I was reading what kind of response she is getting (some of it is not worth discussing) I watched one remarkable video, that I want to share with you, too :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOeDIj40WxM&feature=related

There is no other way!

 

 

Queen Rania in Davos
Queen Rania at the 2008 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland


Mar 19 2008

“Obama, Being Called a Muslim Is Not a Smear”

What a strange header for an article by the well known Canadian writer Naomi Klein!

The Nation: Obama, Being Called a Muslim Is Not a Smear, by Naomi Klein

Hillary Clinton denied leaking the photo of Barack Obama wearing a turban, but her campaign manager says that even if she had, it would be no big deal. “Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.”

Sure she did. And George W. Bush put on a fetching Chamato poncho in Santiago, while Paul Wolfowitz burned up YouTube with his antimalarial African dance routines when he was World Bank prez. The obvious difference is this: when white politicians go ethnic, they just look funny. When a black presidential contender does it, he looks foreign. ..

So far, Obama’s campaign has responded with aggressive corrections that tout his Christian faith, attack the attackers and channel a cooperative witness before the House Un-American Activities Committee. “Barack has never been a Muslim or practiced any other faith besides Christianity,” states one fact sheet. “I’m not and never have been of the Muslim faith,” Obama told a Christian News reporter.

Of course Obama must correct the record, but he doesn’t have to stop there. What is disturbing about the campaign’s response is that it leaves unchallenged the disgraceful and racist premise behind the entire “Muslim smear”: that being Muslim is de facto a source of shame. Obama’s supporters often say they are being “Swiftboated,” casually accepting the idea that being accused of Muslimhood is tantamount to being accused of treason…

How bad things can get?

The second largest religion in the world with 1,2 billion believers worldwide is being brandmarked as a terrorist religion in a campaign where the other party is black. Political correctness does not allow attacking him on grounds of his skin color or other minority related matters like his Kenyan grandmother.

What is more convenient than look for something what is politically correct? Smearing Islam and Muslims is very popular lately. Unfortunately Muslims are unable to defend themselves partly because they are not familiar with western thinking and politics, and partly because they do not care. What some extremist Muslims do must not necessarily be Islamic.

Terror has always been a way to reach goals all over the world. Besides the Islamic terror we have f.e. in Spain the Eta terror and Northern Ireland ethnic terror etc. After decades of  colonialism in the Middle East and Cold War when the Islamic world got divided between superpowers they were mere chess figures in their political game. Today we are reaping the fruits of it.

But slowly they are emerging from the dark and there are signs that moderate progressive forces within the Islamic world are finding their voice. Thank God.

No, it is not a smear being called a Muslim!

“There is no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clearly from falsehood; whoever rejects evil and believes in God has grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold that never breaks and God is All-Hearing and All-Knowing.” (Qur’an 2:256)


Mar 14 2008

Catholic-Muslim Forum is to meet in November

Finally good news after years of mistrust, misinformation and controversy:

Catholic-Muslim Forum is to meet in November Pope Benedict XVI'

Rome — While many Muslims remain hurt by Pope Benedict XVI’s 2006 remarks in Regensburg on Islam, the decision announced Wednesday to create a joint Catholic-Muslim Forum is a “welcome sign of hope,” Muslim delegates said after two days of high-level talks with Vatican officials.

“We all make mistakes and those of big stature make big mistakes,” one of the five Muslim representatives at the talks, Aref Ali Nayed, Director of the Amman, Jordan-based Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre, said.

Nayed, who spoke at a Rome news conference, was referring to the September 2006 speech in Regensburg, Germany, when the pontiff appeared to associate Islam with violence.

“For some Muslims the wounds (of Regensburg) have not healed and some important Muslims are still boycotting the Vatican“, said Nayed, but added that the results of the discussion between his delegation and top Roman Catholic officials was “a sign of great hope.”

The Catholic-Muslim Forum is scheduled to hold its first seminar in Rome from Nov. 4 -6, the Vatican said earlier.

The Vatican also said Benedict would receive participants — 24 religious leaders and scholars from each of the Catholic and Muslim sides — attending the three-day long seminar.

But besides the symbolic importance of the Rome meeting, the Forum - which is destined to meet once every two years in different locations, including majority Muslim nations - would form a “permanent” structure to address inter-religious issues including “crises and misunderstandings” he said.

“We may only meet every two years but we will be communicate every week,” Nayed said. ….

These and other initiatives — some involving Orthodox Christians, Nayed said — all stem from an open letter released in October 2007 by 138 Muslim high-profile leaders in which they called for greater co- operation with Christians on achieving peace. ..

Historical dialog from 1085 image dialog muslimchristian

http://www.aalalbayt.org/en/conferencesandsymposiadialogue-c.html

“The idea of Muslim - Christian Dialogue is exemplified in the importance of exchanging ideas and conceptions on the Arab, local and global levels, in its strong impact in building bridges of confidence among the people of the dialogue, and in strengthening understanding, particularly in this age where no society or country can afford to live isolated from the regional and international currents by virtue of the new technologies of mass communication. Thus, the dialogue is one of these tools which is used to communicate with these cultural and intellectual currents and to keep abreast of them.

Ptolemy, The Almagest, trans. from the Greek by Ishâq ibn Hunayn and corrected by Thâbit ibn Qurra” (copied in the year 478/1085)


Jan 19 2008

Tolerance towards other faiths, Part II

Again and again while reading other blogs and forums the notion comes up, that Islam does not tolerate other faiths and that its main aim would be to convert others under Islam by violent means. As proof they quote isolated Hadiths and suras of the Quran . Nothing would be more wrong and against the spirit of Islam.

It is true, that believers are encouraged to invite people of other faiths to get to know Islam by good example and friendly discussions, but never by force.

As I wrote in the first part of this theme (pls. scroll this page down) the Prophet himself instructed believers not to harm people, who came under the government of the new Muslim state.

There are numerous suras of the Quran and Hadiths to prove this. Many more than there are others, which are taken out of context (from a war situation, when Islam was under attack).

And as always, the text of the Quran is more accurate than the Hadiths, which were sorted out according to their truthfulness as late as 250 years after the death of the Prophet (p.b.u.h.). Please read also on the right panel Topic No. 7  What the Qur’an says about… … other faiths.. tolerance and Hadith’s.

Freedom of Religious Assembly and Religious Autonomy:
Given consent by the constitution, the Jews had the complete freedom to practice their religion. The Jews in Medina at the time of the Prophet had their own school of learning, named Bait-ul-Midras, where they would recite the Torah, worship and educate themselves.
On one occasion, the Prophet received a delegation of sixty Christians from the region of Najran, then a part of Yemen, at his mosque. When the time for their prayer came, they faced the direction of east and prayed. The Prophet ordered that they be left in their state and not harmed.

There are also examples in the life of the Prophet in which he cooperated between with people of other faiths in the political arena as well. He selected a non-Muslim, Amr-ibn Umaiyah-ad-Damri, as an ambassador to be sent to Negus, the King of Ethiopia.

May God bestow upon us wisdom and tolerance to be able to tackle the problems the human race is facing in the near future.

. . . . .

There is no compulsion in religion; truly the right way has become clearly distinct from error; therefore, whoever disbelieves in the Shaitan (Devil) and believes in God he indeed has laid hold on the firmest handle, which shall not break off, and God is Hearing, Knowing.” (Q.2.256)

“God forbids you not, with regards to those who fight you not for [your] faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them; for God loved those who are just.” (Quran, 60:8)

“Say, we believe in God and that which has been revealed to us, and that which was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes and that which was given to Moses and Jesus and to other prophets, from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we submit.” (Q.3:83)


Oct 14 2007

Women in Islam versus Women in the Judeo-Christian Tradition

The Western media is portraying women in Islam as the symbol of subordination of women ‘par excellence’. This picture is so complete that even an attempt to scratch it is in vain. Unfortunately, many journalists choose to rely on wellknown stereotypes. Muslims count over 1 billion in the world alltogether and naturally many sects, small and large, have split from the moderate mainstream Islam, which constitutes ca. 90 % (called the “Sunni”-Muslims). In most Muslim countries today women are advancing and exercising their rights by participating in politics, education, working as judges, professors, doctors etc.

I warmly recommend the following web page to all my readers … since you came to my page you should not miss that one. There you will find proof that it was the Judeo-Christian Tradition that truly oppressed women and it is the Islamic teaching where you find equality and companionship between a man and a woman… And the Veil is not an Islamic invention!

“Women in Islam versus Women in the Judaeo-Christian Tradition” by Prof. Sherif Abdel Azim, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Another enlightening text can be found on www.religioustolerance.org, “Is the Bible infallible, inerrant, free of error?”


Sep 24 2007

Tolarance towards other faiths, Part I

Contrary to the common assumptions, the early Muslim Umma (the Muslim community) practiced tolerance towards other faiths.
A Christian or Jewish woman was not forced to change her faith in case of a marriage to a Muslim man. In the Holy Qur’an Jews and Christians are called “People of the Book”. But a marriage to a pagan woman was not valid if she did not convert to Islam.

The Prophet emphasized in many letters to his emissaries that religious institutions should not be harmed. Here in a letter addressed to his emissary to the religious leaders of Saint Catherine in Mount Sinai who has sought the protection of the Muslims:

“This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them. Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them. No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims’ houses. Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God’s covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate. No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are declared to be protected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants. No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world).”

“…There is no compulsion in religion…” (Quran 2:256)

“…If they do come to you, either judge between them or decline to interfere…” (Quran 5:42)

“Whoever kills a person who has a truce with the Muslims will never smell the fragrance of Paradise.” (Hadith by Saheeh Muslim)

“Beware! Whoever is cruel and hard on a non-Muslim minority, or curtails their rights, or burdens them with more than they can bear, or takes anything from them against their free will; I (Prophet Muhammad) will complain against the person on the Day of Judgment.” (Hadith by Abu Dawud)


Sep 10 2007

5. Jesus, Christianity

Tag: UncategorizedMona @ 2:39 am

Jesus (in Arabic: Esa, Isa or Issa), Christianity, Judaism

“Say: ‘We believe in God, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Ismael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord; We make no difference between one and another of them, And we submit to God.” (Qur’an 2:136)

The controversy about the personality of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) is the major difference between Islam and Christianity. “Islam and Christianity, as taught by Christ himself, are sister religions, only held apart by dogmas and technicalities which might very well be dispensed with.” (Lord Headley, #1)

“The Gospels were composed after the early Christians had become divided in to different factions. They were in fact composed to propagate the special teachings of the various schools and their authors showed no hesitation in tampering with the earlier documents and other traditional material regarding the life and teaching of Jesus to bring them in line with the views of their school.” (Rev. T. G. Tucker)
Rev. T. G. Tucker writes: “Thus Gospels were produced which clearly reflected the conception of the practical needs of the community for which they were written. In them the traditional material was used, but there was no hesitation in altering it or making additions to it, or in leaving out what did not suit the writer’ purpose.” #2)

J. R. Dummelow writes: “A copyist would sometimes put in, not what was in the text, but what he thought ought to be in it. He would trust a fickle memory, or he would make the text accord with the views of the school to which he belonged. In addition to the versions and quotations from the Christian Fathers nearly four thousand Greek MSS of the Testament were known to exist. As a result the variety of reading is considerable.” #3)

C. J. Cadoux (Life of Jesus) writes: “In the four Gospels, therefore, the main documents to which we must go if we are to fill-out at all that bare sketch which we can put together from other sources, we find material of widely-differing quality as regards credibility. So far-reaching is the element of uncertainty that it is tempting to ‘down tools’ at once, and to declare the task hopeless. The historical inconsistencies and improbabilities in parts of the Gospels form some of arguments advanced in favor of the Christ-myth theory. These are, however, entirely out-weighted - as we have shown - by other considerations. Still, the discrepancies and uncertainties that remain are serious - and consequently many moderns, who have no doubt whatever of Jesus’ real existence, regard as hopeless any attempt to dissolve out the historically-true from the legendary or mythical matter which the Gospels contain, and to reconstruct the story of Jesus’ mission out of the more historical residue.” #4)

Concerning the resurrection of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) in the Bible the four Gospels widely differ in reporting that event. This has led Father Gannengiesser in his Book to stress that Paul, who was ‘the sole eyewitness of Christ’s resurrection, whose voice comes directly to us from his writings’, never speaks of his personal encounter with Him Who was raised from the dead-’… except for three extremely discreet references…’-'he refrains moreover from describing it’. #5

“In the ‘Acts of the Apostles’, Luke (who is widely believed to be their author) describes in chapter 1,3 Jesus’ appearance to the apostles, between the Passion and the Ascension, in the following terms: ‘To them he presented himself alive after his passion by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days, and speaking of the kingdom of God’ ” #6)

The Jesus Puzzle: “In the first half century of Christian correspondence, including letters attributed to Paul and other epistles under names like Peter, James and John, the Gospel story cannot be found. When these writers speak of their divine Christ, echoes of Jesus of Nazareth are virtually inaudible, including details of a life and ministry, the circumstances of his death, the attribution of any teachings to him. God himself is often identified as the source of Christian ethics.”

Gospel of Barnabas: “The Gospel of Barnabas was accepted as a Canonical Gospel in the Churches of Alexandria till 325 C.E. Iranaeus (130-200) wrote in support of pure monotheism and opposed Paul for injecting into Christianity doctrines of the pagan Roman religion and Platonic philosophy. He had quoted extensively from the Gospel of Barnabas in support of his views. This shows that the Gospel of Barnabas was in circulation in the first and second centuries of Christianity. In 325 C.E., the Nicene Council was held, where it was ordered that all original Gospels in Hebrew script should be destroyed. An Edict was issued that any one in possession of these Gospels will be put to death. In 383 C.E., the Pope secured a copy of the Gospel of Barnabas and kept it in his private library…  (Read the whole Gospel)

The Gospel of Judas Iskariot “The Gospel of Judas gives a different view of the relationship between Jesus and Judas, offering new insights into the disciple who betrayed Jesus. Unlike the accounts in the canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, in which Judas is portrayed as a reviled traitor, this newly discovered Gospel portrays Judas as acting at Jesus’ request when he hands Jesus over to the authorities.”

“The Fifth Gospel: New Evidence from the Tibetan, Sanskrit, Arabic, Persian and Urdu Sources About the Historical Life of Jesus Christ After the Crucifixion” by Fida Hassnain.
“The Fifth Gospel” presents some compelling new evidence about the life of Jesus which has been derived from a variety of sources in the East which are unknown to most Western scholars. By chance, one of the authors found, in 1965, a reference in Ladakh to the discovery of Buddhist scrolls about Jesus. Since then, the authors have been examining evidence about the survival of Jesus Christ at the time of the crucifixion, and his subsequent travels to the East. The authors’ main purpose in writing this book is to inform the West that “we in the East have some source material about the historical Jesus who lived on after the crucifixion…. This book was not written in one day, but is a result of many years’ continued search for evidence,” and provides research on some very compelling questions.” #12

“Is the Bible infallible, inerrant, free of error?”:Jesus Christ declares in the Bible, that the message he was delivering was not his but God’s: “I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, He gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak” (Bible, John 12.49). Jesus describes himself as “A man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God” (Bible, John 8.40).

Bible, John 16,13-14 (Jesus speaking): “When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.” #10)

In the same way as the Qur’an claims, that the revelation which came to Prophet Mohammad was from the Lord of the Worlds: “And lo it (Qur’an) is a revelation of the Lord of the worlds, which the True Spirit has brought down upon your heart (O, Mohammad), that you may be one of the warners.” (Qur’an 26:192-194)

Muslims believe, that Jesus was a messenger of God, whose birth to his mother Mary was miraculous and that he was able to do miraculous deeds, very much in accordance with the Bible.

Although the Qur’an does not present a detailed life-account of Jesus (in Arabic: Esa), it highlights the important aspects of his birth, his mission, his ascension to heaven and passes judgments on the Christian beliefs concerning him.

“When the angels said: ‘God gives you good tidings of a Word from Him whose name is Messiah Jesus, son of Mary; high honoured shall he be in this world and the next. Near stationed to God. He shall speak to the men in the cradle, and of old age, and righteous he shall be.’ ‘Lord’, said Mary, ‘how shall I have a son seeing no mortal has touched me?’ ‘Even so’ he said, ‘God creates what He will.’ When He decrees a thing He does but say to it, ‘Be’, and it is.” ( Qur’an 3:45-52. Other verses Q. 3:35-9, Q.19:22-23, Q.19:34-5, Q.4:124.161.171-3, Q.5:116-19, Q. 61:6)

“She conceived him and withdrew with him to a distant place. And the birth-pangs surprised her by the trunk of the palm-tree. She said, ‘would I had died before this, and become a thing forgotten.” The one from the below her called to her, “Do not grieve; see, your Lord has set below you a rivulet and shake toward you the palm-trunk, and there shall come tumbling upon you dates and ripe. Eat therefore, and drink, and be comforted; and if you should see any mortal, say, ‘I have vowed to the All-Merciful a fast, and today I will not speak to any man.’ The she brought the child to her folk carrying him; and they said, ‘Mary you have surely committed a monstrous thing. Sister of Aaron, your father was not a wicked man, nor was your mother a woman of unchaste.’ Mary pointed to the child; but they said, ‘How shall we speak to one who is still in the cradle, a little child?’ He said, ‘Lo, I am God’s servant; god has given me the Book and made me a Prophet. Blessed He has made me, wherever I may be; and He has enjoined me to pray, and to give the alms, so long as I live, and likewise the cherish my mother; He has not made me arrogant or wicked. Peace be upon me, the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I am raised up alive.’ “(Qur’an 19.22-23)

“And for their unbelief, and their uttering against Mary a mighty calumny, and for their saying, ‘We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, the Messenger of God’, yet they did not slay him, neither crucified him, only a likeness of that was shown to them. Those who are at variance concerning him surely are in doubt regarding him, they have no knowledge of him, except the following of surmise; and they did not slay him of certainty, no indeed; God raised him up to him; God is Almighty, All-wise. There is not one of the people of the Book but will assuredly believe in him before his death, and on the Resurrection Day he will be a witness against them.” (Qur’an 4:156-9)

This teaching can also be found in the Christian-Gnostic Tradition, i.e.. Johns Records 97, 99 , 101, 102; according to Basilides Simon of Kyrene was crucified in the place of Jesus (p.b.u.h.).

In Islam there is no “Original” or “Inherited Sin”. The doctrine of the “Inherited Sin” also finds no support in the words of Jesus or of the Prophets who had come before him. They taught that every man was accountable for his own actions, the children will not be punished for the sins of the father.

Furthermore, when the Qur’an speaks about the suffering of women during the period of pregnancy and childbirth, nowhere does it connect it with the concept of original sin.

“In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children’s teeth are set on edge. But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.” (Bible, Jeremiah, 31:29-30)

Unitarianism, the form of Christianity that denies the doctrines of the Trinity, is maintaining that God exists in one person only. From the middle of the 2nd century to the end of the 3rd century a succession of eminent Christian teachers, Monarchians, maintained the undivided unity of God. Modern Unitarianism, however, traces its history to more recent sources… Unitarians are generally agreed in rejecting the entire orthodox Christian outlook. They deny the doctrines of the Trinity, the vicarious atonement, the deity of Jesus Christ, original sin and everlasting punishment, regarding them as both unscriptural and irrational.” (Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2001)

“That is Jesus, son of Mary, in word of truth, concerning which they are doubting. It is not for God to take a son unto Him. Glory be to Him ! When he decrees a thing. He but says to it ‘Be’, and it is.” (Qur’an 19.34-5)


Qur’an 9:30-31: “The Christians say, ‘The Messiah is the Son of God’ … God assail them ! How they are perverted ! .. They were commanded to serve but One God; there is no God but He.”

Qur’an 22:40 “Those who have been expelled from their homes without a just cause except that they say: Our Lord is GOD. And had there not been God’s repelling some people by others, certainly there would have been pulled down cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques in which God’s name is much remembered; and surely God will help him who helps His cause; most surely God is Strong, Mighty.”

According to the Holy Qur’an Jesus (p.b.u.h.) did not die on a cross. He was raised to God.

From a reportage on Dec.18th 1999, Spiegel-TV:
“….. At that time crucifying was the most common type of death penalty for criminals in Palestine and they must have been, not in thousands, but in tens of thousands altogether. One occasion was mentioned, where culprits were allowed to be taken down from the cross after two days and two of the three men were still alive and thus escaped the death sentence. It is quite possible, that Jesus, if he was crucified, survived the ordeal, and that would also explain why the cave where his body was laid down was empty in the next morning.
Prof. Harmuth Stegemann (Theologe, Univ.Goettingen) is studying the famous ‘Qumran Rolls’ (= Dead Sea Rolls) for 30 years and says, that despite of the many reports in the New Testament (all of them must be considered quite unreliable) almost nothing is known today about the life of Jesus as facts.

It would come to most visitors of the birth-place of Jesus as a shock, if they knew that many biblical archeologists agree today, that Jesus was probably not born there. Constantine, the first Christian Roman Ruler built the ‘Birth Church’ of Jesus in 336 (A.D.) on the place where Jesus is thought to be born.
The only thing that speaks for Jerusalem/Bethlehem as birth-place is, that according to the old prophesies ‘Messias’ was to be born there and therefore for the early Christians Jesus, whom they believed to be the awaited Messiah, logically was born in Jerusalem…

Very few places can today be accurately connected with Jesus. Lake Genezareth is one of them. In the fishing village Capernaum Jesus paid taxes and therefore he was probably born there.


In the New Testament it is reported that Jesus taught in Nazareth, but at that time no synagogue existed in Nazareth. In the village Capernaum a synagogue from the 1st century is being excavated that most probably was the place where Jesus lived and taught………. “

The Pope contradicts the Bible: “The traditional Biblical account of Jesus’ crucifixion is, that he was arrested and crucified by the orders and plans of the chief priest and Jewish elders. This account was denied in the 1960’s by the highest Catholic Christian authority, the Pope. He issued a statement in which he said the Jews had nothing to do with Jesus’ crucifixion. You might say, this is a political decree. Or that the Church had introduced many elements into Christianity and was influenced by many factors which made its view of Christianity not only changeable but, by and large, contradict the early forms of Christianity.

Most serious studies of the Bible have shown that it contains a large portion of additions, which neither Jesus nor the writers of the Gospels said. The church, as Heinz Zahrnt said, ” put words into the mouth of Jesus which he newer spoke and attributed actions to him which he never performed.” However, they are kept secret or available only to the specialists. One of those, who has shown, that most of what the church says about Jesus is baseless is the German journalist and author Rudolf Augstein in his book “Jesus Son of Man” #7)

One of the studies is a book entitled “The Myth of God Incarnate” (edited by John Hick) written by seven Christian scholars in England. Their conclusion is, that Jesus was “a man approved by God, for special role within the divine purpose, and … the later conception of him as God Incarnate … is a mythological or poetic way of expressing his significance for us.” #8)


The Holy Qur’an states:

“There is no compulsion in religion” (Q. 2:256)

“Truth comes from your Lord. Let anyone who will, believe, and let anyone who wishes, disbelieve.” (Qur’an 18.29)

“God forbids you not, with regards to those who fight you not for (your) faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them; for God loves those who are just.” (Q. 60.8)

“Abraham was not a Jew or a Christian; but he was true in faith, and bowed his will to God’s (= was a Muslim) and he joined not gods with God. Without doubt, among people, the nearest of kin to Abraham are those who follow him, as are also this apostle (Mohammad) and those who believe. And God is the protector of those who have faith.” (Q.3:67-68)

Muslims believe in a chain prophets starting with Adam and including Noah, Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Job, Moses, Aaron, David, Solomon, Elias, Jonah, John the Baptist, and Jesus, peace be upon them all. But God’s final message to man, a summing up of all that has been sent before was revealed to Prophet Mohammad (p.b.u.h).

TIME article - Jesus Of Nazareth Then And Now, Monday, Dec. 06, 1999
By Reynolds Price:

It reflects also the question of the genuineness of the Gospels. Quote: “The disappointing fact seems to be that most of the surviving New Testament Apocrypha arose in legitimate attempts to comprehend realities about which the canonical Gospels are mute, and any dogged attempt to read them is apt to leave the reader with one prime reaction–those 2nd and 3rd century Christian editors who decided on the final contents of the New Testament were, above all else, superb literary critics. And so we have the four Gospels. It has been fashionable among New Testament scholars for most of the 20th century to say that the Gospels are not what they claim to be: brief biographies…

Many modern scholars, however, have tended to see them as propaganda, as campaign biographies–documents that contain fragments of actual history, but history so shaped and transformed by faith as to require caution in the reader who seeks firm fact.” #11)


About the same theme: “The Atlantic Monthly”, Dec.96: “The Search for a No-Frills Jesus.”

The famous Dead Sea Scrolls, about early Christianity

The Ancient Library of Qumran and Modern Scholarship

Who wrote the Bible? (Part 1) 07-Jan-2002

The Authenticity of the Qur’an:
There is no doubt about the authenticity of the Qur’an. It contains nothing but the revelations received by the Prophet Mohammad (p.b.u.h.). The revelations came to him in fragments on different occasions, from time to time over a period of 23 years (610-632 A.D.). As soon as he received any, he used to communicate it to his companions and ask them not only to commit it to memory, but also to write them down. (Prophet Mohammad could not read or write.)

On each occasion he indicated in a precise manner the place to which the revelation belonged. Thus the complete Qur’an was committed to writing and also preserved in the hearts of hundreds of persons in the life-time of the Prophet.

After the passing away of the Prophet (p.b.u.h), Abu Bakr, the first Caliph charged Zaid ibn Thabit with the task of preparing an authentic copy of the entire text in the form of a book. The companions of the Prophets had recorded the revelations that had come to the Prophets “on palm leaves and flat stones and in the hearts of men”. (This is not surprising: the oral tradition was strong and well established, and the Arabic script which was written without the vowel markings and consonantal dots used today, served mainly as an aid to memorization.) Zaid ibn Thabit collected all the recordings and, after comparing them with what the followers of the Prophet hat learnt by heart, compiled a copy, called “MUS’RAF” (bound leaves), about the genuineness or correctness of which there was no doubt.

The establishment of such a text in the beginning had not been of primary concern: the Medinan Arabs, an unlikely coalition of ex-merchants, desert nomads, and agriculturalists united in a potent new faith and inspired by the life of Prophet Mohammad, were at the time pursuing a fantastically successful series of international conquests in the name of Islam.

By the 640’s the Arabs possessed most of Syria, Iraq, Persia, and Egypt, and thirty years later they were taking over parts of Europe, North Africa, and Central Asia.
Muslims at the edges of the empire began arguing over what was Qur’anic scripture and what was not. An army general returning from Azerbaijan expressed his fears about sectarian controversy to the Caliph Uthman (644-656 A.D.), the third Islamic ruler to succeed Prophet Mohammad (p.b.u.h.) and is said to have entreated him to “overtake these people before they differ over the Qur’an the way the Jews and Christians differ over their Scripture.” Uthman convened an editorial committee that carefully gathered the various pieces of scripture that had been memorized or written down by the Prophet’s companions. The result was a standard written version of the Qur’an. Uthman ordered all incomplete and ‘imperfect’ collections of the Qur’anic scripture destroyed. #9)

At the order of Uthman seven copies of the Mus’raf-edition of the Holy Qur’an were sent to the different centers of the vast Islamic world. One of these seven original copies still exists in Tashkent.

*************************************************************

#1) Lord Headley, ” A Western Awakening to Islam.” (page 15)

#2) Rev. T.G. Tucker: “History of the Christians in the light of Modern Knowledge.” (page 320)

#3) J.R. Dummelow: “Commentary on the Holy Bible.” (page 16)

#4) C.J. Cadoux: “Life of Jesus” (The Author was Mackennal Prof. of Churh History at Oxford Univ.)

#5) Father Kannengiesser: “Faith in the Resurrection, Resurrection of Faith” (Foi en la Resurrection, Resurrection de la Foi), 1974

#6) Pages 94-109, “The Bible, The Qur’an And Science” by Maurice Bucaille, “… many questions regarding The Bible and The Quran clarified..”

#7) Rudolf Augstein: “Jesus Son of Man” (Germany 1972, English translation 1977)

#8) John Hick (ed.): “The Myth of God Incarnate.” (1977 England, written by 7 theologian Scholars)

#9) “The Atlantic Monthly”, old Qur’anic fragments found in Yemen.

#10) “Is the Bible infallible, inerrant, free of error?” at Religioustolerance.org

#11) TIME -Jesus Of Nazareth Then And Now, By Reynolds Price

#12 The Fifth Gospel: New Evidence from the Tibetan, Sanskrit, Arabic, Persian and Urdu Sources About the Historical Life of Jesus Christ After the Crucifixion, by Fida Hassnain